The legality and morality surrounding pornographic content have become a significant topic of discussion in today’s society, fueled by technological advancements and ever-changing societal norms. Recent news has highlighted India’s position as one of the largest consumers of adult content, raising concerns about personal freedom and legal boundaries. Nevertheless, a recent ruling by the Kerala High Court has shed light on a new perspective in this ongoing debate. They ruled that viewing pornography privately, without sharing it with others, is not a violation of the law, as it falls within the realm of personal choice.
The court made the findings while squashing a criminal case filed against a man in 2016 by the Aluva police of the Ernakulam district for watching a pornographic film on his mobile phone on the street near Aluva Palace at night. The person in question was charged under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with the sale, distribution, public exhibition, import and export of obscene material, among other things.
In his ruling on September 5, Justice PV Kunhikrishnan stated that such an action is a citizen’s private choice and interfering with it would violate his privacy. The judge stated that it would have been an infraction if the accused attempted to circulate, disseminate, or publicly display any indecent film or photo.
While India wrestles with challenges over pornographic material consumption, the Kerala High Court’s historic ruling has sent shockwaves throughout the legal landscape. Watching pornographic content in the privacy of one’s own environment, according to this ruling, is not a criminal violation under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code. The court emphasized that judicial action is only appropriate when an individual tries to circulate, disseminate, or publicly display explicit content.
The ruling handed down by Justice P V Kunhikrishnan underlines a crucial principle: the integrity of personal privacy. In an age where digital access has rendered adult content pervasive and easily accessible, the court’s decision recognizes the importance of safeguarding an individual’s private choices from unwanted intrusion. Justice Kunhikrishnan stated that making private consumption of sexual material a crime would infringe on an individual’s privacy, noting that the court’s role is to evaluate whether an action is criminal.
However, it is essential to acknowledge the drawbacks of this evaluation. It does not condone or encourage pornography but instead attempts to protect the right to privacy. The ruling separates private consumption and public distribution of pornography, focusing primarily on the latter as an offence under Section 292 of the IPC. Furthermore, the Kerala High Court’s ruling aligns with the extending global debate on personal liberty and the state’s role in regulating individual behaviour. This decision fosters a more nuanced understanding of the junction of individual liberties and societal responsibilities, and it opens the door to talks about how other areas of law may need to adjust to our rapidly evolving environment.
In a world where disputes over individual rights and public morality continue to clash, the Kerala High Court’s decision adds an entirely fresh perspective. It urges society to discern between personal choices and behaviours that require legal intervention, underlining the value of privacy in an era of unbeatable digital exposure. Lastly, the court’s ruling delivers a relevant angle: in the face of changing norms and technology, the line between individual freedom and a societal obligation must be carefully navigated at all times. As India deals with the intricate problems surrounding pornography, the Kerala High Court’s ruling adds a new dimension to the continuing debate, underlining the value of personal privacy within the confines of the law.